I solidified my Ruthless Editor stance years ago for well-paying job, and I haven’t changed my mind, despite seeing and hearing claims that good-paying job also can be acceptable.
Here’s why I’m sticking with well-paying:
A job is a thing — a noun.
Adjectives modify nouns.
You can have a good job, a hard job, an exciting job or a boring job.
But you can’t have a well job.
Getting paid for a job is an action — a verb.
Adverbs modify verbs.
You can have a job that pays regularly, pays sporadically, pays poorly or pays well.
But you can’t have a job that pays good — at least not in Standard English.
Not all online sources agree. One of my favorites, dailywritingtips.com, notes that Google searches for good-paying and well-paying are almost equal.
In other words, about half of people conducting searches consider good-paying job an acceptable term, and half consider well-paying job an acceptable term.
But that doesn’t mean both word choices are right.
Another source, grammarphobia.com, points out:
Language authorities say “good” has been used as an adverb or a quasi-adverb since the Middle Ages, and this adverbial usage wasn’t criticized until the latter half of the 19th century.
In fact, the phrase “good-paying job” doesn’t strike us as bad English— informal, perhaps, but not incorrect.
I disagree. So does dailywritingtips.com, which puts it this way:
“This job pays good” is undeniably nonstandard usage.
You might have a good job that pays well, a bad job that pays well, a good job that pays poorly, or a bad job that pays poorly.
My hope for you of course is the first scenario: a good and well-paying job.
Do you have a friend or colleague who shares the confusion over good-paying and well-paying? Pass along this blog and spread the enlightenment!
Follow Me: LinkedIn Twitter G+
Latest posts by Kathy Watson (see all)
- Some Fun with UP: A Much-Used Two-Letter Word - December 5, 2017
- Headline Bloopers and Grammar Lessons - November 29, 2017
- What’s the Difference Between Optimum and Optimal? - November 21, 2017